The Interlake Inquirer

Book Reviews and Recommendations

By Leslie Park  •  Dec 6, 2023  •  2 minute read

A review of two books: Twilight and War and Peace.

These days, books and novels are rapidly disseminating through the media - and not all the books are necessarily of the best quality. But I am going to focus on two books: one a teenage cult classic, Twilight, and another (older) classic, War and Peace. I have a disclaimer for those reading that I dislike both books and I will stand by my opinions, no matter what anyone says. Despite all that, I will review (rant) about the books and make GOOD alternative books to read instead. Onwards!

Twilight

It’s the classic (boring) trope about forbidden love and lust. A “vampire” Edward loves Bella, a girl with nothing special but the fact that her blood smells delicious. Wow… special, don’t you think? But what I don’t like is the fact that Bella has ALWAYS been a damsel in distress. Self-reliance is what most people survive on, and if you die because you are in an accident, you deal with it. She lost that capability and was fine with being under his protection 24/7. Growing up and becoming an adult is riddled with accidents, trouble, and the different issues life might throw in you. Being strong in the face of adversity (even if you are alone) is a lesson that most people learn. Bella obviously did not.

Now, I suggest the novel Dracula instead. The original vampire story features stronger and well-developed characters that Twilight obviously lacks. Yes, there is horror, but the main female character, Mina maintains her faith and courage throughout, sticking to her beliefs and solving her own problems. The vampire Dracula is unpretentiously evil- he does not pretend to have internal beauty or a “bright side”. His darkness contrasts well with the light and vitality, creating a story of horror, love, and desperation that appeals to all readers (unlike Twilight).

War and Peace

I think countless readers out there would disagree with me on this- but War and Peace was one of the worst books I’ve ever read. First, it was a very biased and romanticized view of the time. My own opinion is that history should not be romanticized, and that the main character, Pierre, was a bit of a fanatic for a while. But I digress. Additionally, the realizations the characters have about war such as Prince Andrei’s “can it really be that, for court and personal considerations, tens of thousands of lives must be risked — and my own, my life?”, are obvious things most people realize without lying wounded on a battlefield. Just saying. No one (or so I thought) needs to be told that war leads to the destruction of society, the people within it, and may also result in your untimely demise.

An alternative novel is called The Alice Network by Kate Quinn. A book set in dual timelines of WWI and post-World War II Great Britain, it’s an excellent war novel that mixes political intrigue, broken friendships, and love. Focusing on two female characters, one intent on figuring out her family and past, the other intent on hiding her stories behind closed doors, it provides emotional depth, as well as solid historical knowledge and background. Surprisingly, it is quite blunt for an historical fiction novel, without much romanticizing, and straightforward characters and stories. If you want to read a book based on historical background, read this instead- it is not about imperial Russia, but the war and intrigue are there- and better.